Diet and cancer: the evidence

Find out about the evidence linking diet and cancer. This page contains information about the links between diet and cancer. Click on the links below to read about specific topics.

You can find out more about the evidence behind other health topics in our other How do we know? pages.

 

An unhealthy diet can increase the risk of cancer

Scientists have estimated that unhealthy diets cause from 10 to 30% of cancer deaths in developed countries. 1,2

Very few specific foods or drinks have been convincingly shown to increase or reduce the risk of cancer. 3 This is because person’s diet consists of many different foods, nutrients and chemicals that affect their risk of cancer. It is very difficult to design studies that can accurately look at the effect of a single food item. This page will tell you about those aspects of our diet that are reasonably linked to cancer by the current scientific evidence.

 

Eating lots of fibre could reduce the risk of bowel cancer

Cancer Research UK currently funds the UK arm of a massive international study called EPIC, which is studying the links between diet and cancer. EPIC scientists recently found that eating foods high in fibre can reduce the risk of bowel cancer. 4 People who ate the most fibre had 25-40% lower risk of bowel cancer compared to people who ate the least. Some other large studies have supported these findings. 5,6,7,8

Not all studies agree. Some have found that fibre does not affect bowel cancer risk. 9,10,11 But these studies only investigated populations from single countries, and may have looked at ranges of fibre that were too low. For example, Americans eat very little fibre on average. So a large study that focused on Americans would not be able to see the benefits of the high levels of fibre that, for example, an Italian person would eat.

The EPIC study covers 10 European countries, with a wide range of fibre intake and can detect connections that other studies may have missed. 12

 

Fibre triggers the production of helpful chemicals, and increases the frequency of bowel movements

Fibre could protect against bowel cancer in a few different ways

Bacteria in the bowel interact with fibre to produce several chemicals including butyrate. 13 Butyrate changes the conditions in the bowel, so that tumours are less likely to develop. Lab experiments have shown that butyrate can also stop the growth of cancer cells and cause them to die off. 14

Fibre also increases the weight of the stools and the frequency of bowel movements. This reduces the contact time between the bowel and chemicals in the stools. 13

 

Fruit and vegetables may reduce the risk of many cancers

 The EPIC study has found that eating lots of fruit and vegetables could reduce the risk of mouth, oesophageal and lung cancers, 15,16 as well as some types of stomach cancer. 17 EPIC has also found that fruit and vegetables are unlikely to reduce the risk of breast, prostate, ovarian or kidney cancers. 18,19,20

Some studies have found that people who eat the most fruit and vegetables can lower their risk of cancer by about a quarter compared to those who eat the least. 21,22,23 Specifically, eating lots of fruit and vegetables could reduce the risk of mouth, oesophageal and laryngeal cancers by at least a third, 15,24 and the risk of lung cancer by at least a quarter. 25

 

Fruit and vegetables are a good source of vitamins, minerals, and fibre.

Fruit and vegetables contain a wide range of nutrients. Researchers are still trying to work out which of these might reduce cancer risk. Studies are looking at specific nutrients such as vitamin E, 26 and folate. 27

But it may be that you need these nutrients in balanced combinations to reduce the risk of cancer effectively. 28 Differently coloured fruit and vegetables contain different nutrients so it is important to eat a wide range of colours. 29 One study found that people who eat the widest range of fruit and vegetables have 22% lower risk of mouth cancer than those who eat the narrowest range. 30

There is strong evidence that the nutrients in fruit and vegetables do not reduce the risk of cancer when they are taken as supplements. High doses of supplements could even have harmful effects. 31

Fruit and vegetables are also a very good source of natural fibre 4, and there is strong evidence that high levels of fibre reduce risk of bowel cancer.

 

Fruit and vegetables have wide health benefits

People were first recommended to eat five portions of fruit and vegetables a day in 1991 based on the scientific evidence at the time. Since then, many expert reports on diet and cancer prevention have supported the 5-a-day message 21,32,33,34,35.

Eating five daily portions of fruit and vegetables can help you maintain a healthy body weight. 21 Doing this can help you reduce the risk of bowel, breast, kidney, womb and oesophageal cancers. And getting enough fruit and vegetables can also reduce the risk of many other diseases including heart disease and diabetes. 21,36 The EPIC study found that people who ate the most fruit and vegetables reduced their risk of dying from chronic diseases like heart diseases, cancer and diabetes by a quarter. 37

 

Eating lots of red or processed meat can increase the risk of cancer

 Many studies have shown that eating lots of red or processed meat increases the risk of bowel cancer. 38,39,40,41 Red meat includes all fresh, minced and frozen beef, pork and lamb. Processed meat includes ham, bacon, salami and sausages. The EPIC study found that people who ate two daily 80g portions of these meats increased their bowel cancer risk by a third, compared to those who ate just 20g a day. 40 Processed meat increased bowel cancer risk more than red meat. Studies that review all the available scientific evidence agree with these results. 39,42

There is growing evidence that links red meat to pancreatic cancer, 43,44 and stomach cancer. 45 The EPIC study found that eating lots of meat, particularly red and processed meat could also increase the risk of stomach cancer. People eating over 100g of meat a day had over 3 times the risk of getting stomach cancer. 46 Another very large study found that people who eat the most red or processed meat have 40-50% higher risk of pancreatic cancer. 47

There is no strong evidence that eating white meat, such as chicken, can increase cancer risk. 40

 

Red and processed meat contain chemicals that could cause bowel cancer

Red and processed meat contains a red pigment called haem. Haem could stimulate the bacteria in our guts to produce chemicals called N-nitroso compounds, or NOCs. 48 Many of these are known to cause cancer. Almost all red and processed meats contain more haem than white meats. This may explain why red and processed meats increase bowel cancer risk while white meats do not. 49

Haem could also irritate or damage the cells in the bowel. The cells divide much more than normal to compensate for this damage. This increases the chance that one of these cells could acquire changes that set it down the road to cancer. 48 There is some evidence that the effects of haem could be countered by chlorophyll, found in green vegetables. 50,51

The way meat is cooked can also affect the risk of cancer. Cooking meat at high temperatures, such as frying or barbecuing, produces chemicals called heterocyclic amines. 52 These can damage DNA and increase the risk of cancer. 53,54

Some processed meat contains chemicals called nitrites. In the bowel, nitrites are converted into NOCs, which could cause cancer. 50 One group of scientists analysed over 60 studies and found that nitrites, and foods rich in them, are linked to higher risks of stomach cancer. 55

 

Eating lots of fish could reduce the risk of bowel cancer

The EPIC study recently reported that people who an 80g portion of fish a day reduced their bowel cancer risk by a third compared to people who ate less than that in a week. Some other studies have shown similar results, 56 but the evidence is still inconsistent.

It is not clear how eating fish could reduce the risk of cancer. Fish oils are especially rich in polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids (O3FAs), but there is no strong evidence that these can reduce the risk of cancer. 57

 

Eating lots of saturated fat could increase the risk of breast cancer

The link between fat and breast cancer is very controversial. Scientists have disagreed over whether the amount of fat you eat affects your risk of breast cancer.

One of the problems lies in the way fat is measured. Some studies use questionnaires to calculate the fat content in the food people eat. But these are not very accurate. Other studies ask people to fill in food diaries, which give a more precise record of what people eat.

Two of the largest studies so far, including EPIC, have used these diaries to show that women who eat the most saturated fat have higher risk of breast cancer. 58,59 Fat in our diets probably affects the risk of breast cancer by increasing the levels of oestrogen and other hormones in our blood. 60

 

Eating lots of salt could increase the risk of stomach cancer

There is some evidence that eating too much salty food, or food that has been preserved with salt, could increase the risk of stomach cancer. Stomach cancer is especially common in countries like Japan where people tend to eat lots of salty and salt-preserved foods. 61

Salt could affect the risk of stomach cancer by damaging the lining of the stomach and causing inflammation. Salt could also interact with a stomach bug called Helicobacter pylori that cause both stomach ulcers and stomach cancer. 61

Browse related content

References

  1.  Doll, R. and R. Peto, Epidemiology of Cancer. Oxford Textbook of Medicine, ed. D. Warrell, et al. 2003, Oxford: OUP.
  2.  Peto, J., Cancer epidemiology in the last century and the next decade. . Nature, 2003. 411: p. 390-5. PubMed
  3.  World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research, Food, nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. . 2007, Washington DC: AICR.
  4.  Bingham, S.A., et al., Dietary fibre in food and protection against colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): an observational study. Lancet, 2003. 361(9368): p. 1496-501. PubMed
  5.  Peters, U., et al., Dietary fibre and colorectal adenoma in a colorectal cancer early detection programme. Lancet, 2003. 361(9368): p. 1491-5. PubMed
  6.  Jacobs, D.J., et al., Whole-grain intake and cancer: an expanded review and meta-analysis. Nutr Cancer, 1998. 30: p. 85-96. PubMed
  7.  Nomura, A.M., et al., Dietary fiber and colorectal cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study. Cancer Causes Control, 2007. PubMed
  8.  Wakai, K., et al., Dietary fiber and risk of colorectal cancer in the Japan collaborative cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2007. 16(4): p. 668-75. PubMed
  9.  Fuchs, C.S., et al., Dietary fiber and the risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma in women. N Engl J Med, 1999. 340(3): p. 169-76. PubMed
  10.  Pietinen, P., et al., Diet and risk of colorectal cancer in a cohort of Finnish men. Cancer Causes Control, 1999. 10(5): p. 387-96. PubMed
  11.  Terry, P., et al., Fruit, vegetables, dietary fiber, and risk of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2001. 93(7): p. 525-33. PubMed
  12.  Bingham, S. and E. Riboli, Diet and cancer--the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Nat Rev Cancer, 2004. 4(3): p. 206-15. PubMed
  13.  Bingham, S., Mechanisms and experimental evidence relating dietary fibre and starch to protection aganist large bowel cancer. . Proc Nutr Soc, 1990. 49: p. 153-171. PubMed
  14.  Boffa, L., et al., Modulation of colonic epithelial cell proliferation, histone acetylation, and luminal short chain fatty acids by variation of dietary fiber (wheat bran) in rats,. Cancer Res, 1992(5906-5912). PubMed
  15.  Boeing, H., et al., Intake of fruits and vegetables and risk of cancer of the upper aero-digestive tract: the prospective EPIC-study. Cancer Causes Control, 2006. 17(7): p. 957-69. PubMed
  16.  Miller, A.B., et al., Fruits and vegetables and lung cancer: Findings from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Int J Cancer, 2004. 108(2): p. 269-276. PubMed
  17.  Gonzalez, C.A., et al., Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of stomach and oesophagus adenocarcinoma in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-EURGAST). Int J Cancer, 2006. 118(10): p. 2559-66. PubMed
  18.  van Gils, C., et al., Consumption of vegetables and fruits and risk of breast cancer. JAMA, 2005. 293: p. 183-93. PubMed
  19.  Key, T.J., et al., Fruits and vegetables and prostate cancer: No association among 1,104 cases in a prospective study of 130,544 men in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Int J Cancer, 2004. 109(1): p. 119-24. PubMed
  20.  Schulz, M., et al., Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2005. 14(11 Pt 1): p. 2531-5. PubMed
  21.  IARC, Fruits and Vegetables. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, ed. H. Vainio and F. Bianchini. Vol. 8. 2003, Lyon: IARC.
  22.  Van't Veer, P., et al., Fruits and vegetables in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. . Pub Health Nutr, 2000. 3: p. 103-107. PubMed
  23.  Benetou, V., et al., Vegetables and fruits in relation to cancer risk: evidence from the Greek EPIC cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2008. 17(2): p. 387-92. PubMed
  24.  Freedman, N.D., et al., Fruit and vegetable intake and head and neck cancer risk in a large United States prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer, 2008. 122(10): p. 2330-6. PubMed
  25.  Smith-Warner, S., et al., Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cancer, 2003. 107: p. 1001-11. PubMed
  26.  Albanes, D., et al., Effects of alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene supplements on cancer incidence in the Alpha-Tocopherol Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study. Am J Clin Nutr, 1995. 62: p. 1427S-1430S. PubMed
  27.  Sanjoaquin, M., et al., Folate intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analytical approach. Int J Cancer, 2004. Epub ahead of print. PubMed
  28.  Ohigashi, H., A. Murakami, and Cancer prevention with food factors: Alone and in combination. Biofactors, 2004. 22: p. 49-55. PubMed
  29.  IARC, World Cancer Report, ed. B. Stewart and P. Kleihues. 2003, Lyon IARCPress.
  30.  Garavello, W., et al., Diet diversity and the risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer. Eur J Nutr, 2008. PubMed
  31.  Hercberg, S., S. Czernichow, and P. Galan, Antioxidant vitamins and minerals in prevention of cancers: lessons from the SU.VI.MAX study. Br J Nutr, 2006. 96 Suppl 1: p. S28-30. PubMed
  32.  ACS, Advisory Committee on Diet, Nutrition and Cancer Prevention Guidelines on diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin, 1996. 46: p. 325-341. PubMed
  33.  NCI, '5 a day' for better health. , NCI: Bethseda. Link
  34.  WCRF and AICR, Food, nutrition and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. 1997, American Institute for Cancer Research: Washington. p. 37-145. Link
  35.  WHO, FAO/WHO consultation on the health implications of acrylamide in food: summary report. 2002, WHO: Geneva. p. 1-12. Link
  36.  Genkinger, J., et al., Fruit, Vegetable, and Antioxidant Intake and All-Cause, Cancer, and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in a Community-dwelling Population in Washington County, Maryland. . Am J Epidemiol, 2004. 160: p. 1223-1233. PubMed
  37.  Agudo, A., et al., Fruit and vegetable intakes, dietary antioxidant nutrients, and total mortality in Spanish adults: findings from the Spanish cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Spain). Am J Clin Nutr, 2007. 85(6): p. 1634-42. PubMed
  38.  WHO/FAO, Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation on Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, in WHO Technical Report Series. 2003, WHO: Geneva. p. 95-104. Link
  39.  Sandhu, M., I. White, and K. McPherson, Systematic review of the prospective cohort studies on meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analytical approach. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2001. 10: p. 439-446. PubMed
  40.  Norat, T., et al., Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into cancer and nutrition. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2005. 97(12): p. 906-16. PubMed
  41.  Larsson, S.C. and A. Wolk, Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Cancer, 2006. PubMed
  42.  Norat, T., et al., Meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer, 2002. 98: p. 241-56. PubMed
  43.  Larsson, S.C., et al., Meat, fish, poultry and egg consumption in relation to risk of pancreatic cancer: A prospective study. Int J Cancer, 2005. PubMed
  44.  Larsson, S.C., N. Orsini, and A. Wolk, Processed meat consumption and stomach cancer risk: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2006. 98(15): p. 1078-87. PubMed
  45.  Larsson, S.C., L. Bergkvist, and A. Wolk, Processed meat consumption, dietary nitrosamines and stomach cancer risk in a cohort of Swedish women. Int J Cancer, 2006. PubMed
  46.  Gonzalez, C.A., et al., Meat intake and risk of stomach and esophageal adenocarcinoma within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). J Natl Cancer Inst, 2006. 98(5): p. 345-54. PubMed
  47.  Stolzenberg-Solomon, R.Z., et al., Meat and meat-mutagen intake and pancreatic cancer risk in the NIH-AARP cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2007. 16(12): p. 2664-75. PubMed
  48.  Cross, A.J., J.R. Pollock, and S.A. Bingham, Haem, not protein or inorganic iron, is responsible for endogenous intestinal N-nitrosation arising from red meat. Cancer Res, 2003. 63(10): p. 2358-60. PubMed
  49.  Navarro, A., et al., Meat cooking habits and risk of colorectal cancer in Cordoba, Argentina. Nutrition, 2004. 20: p. 873-877. PubMed
  50.  Bingham, S., et al., Does increased endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds in the human colon explain the association between red meat and colon cancer? Carcinogenesis, 1996. 17: p. 515-523. PubMed
  51.  Balder, H.F., et al., Heme and chlorophyll intake and risk of colorectal cancer in the Netherlands cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2006. 15(4): p. 717-25. PubMed
  52.  Layton, D., et al., Cancer risk of heterocyclic amines in cooked foods: an analysis and implications for research. Carcinogenesis, 1995. 16: p. 39-52. PubMed
  53.  Gooderham, N., et al., Assessing human risk to heterocyclic amines. Mutat Res, 1997. 376: p. 53-60. PubMed
  54.  Sinha, R., et al., Meat, meat cooking methods and preservation, and risk for colorectal adenoma. Cancer Res, 2005. 65(17): p. 8034-41. PubMed
  55.  Jakszyn, P. and C.A. Gonzalez, Nitrosamine and related food intake and gastric and oesophageal cancer risk: A systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. World J Gastroenterol, 2006. 12(27): p. 4296-4303. PubMed
  56.  Hall, M.N., et al., A 22-year Prospective Study of Fish, n-3 Fatty Acid Intake, and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2008. 17(5): p. 1136-43. PubMed
  57.  MacLean, C.H., et al., Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cancer risk: a systematic review. Jama, 2006. 295(4): p. 403-15. PubMed
  58.  Bingham, S.A., et al., Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer? Lancet, 2003. 362(9379): p. 212-4. PubMed
  59.  Thiebaut, A.C., et al., Dietary fat and postmenopausal invasive breast cancer in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2007. 99(6): p. 451-62. PubMed
  60.  Wu, A.H., M.C. Pike, and D.O. Stram, Meta-analysis: dietary fat intake, serum estrogen levels, and the risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1999. 91(6): p. 529-34. PubMed
  61.  Shikata, K., et al., A prospective study of dietary salt intake and gastric cancer incidence in a defined Japanese population: the Hisayama study. Int J Cancer, 2006. 119(1): p. 196-201. PubMed